I begin with Lawrence krauss’s idea which is the thought
that if the total energy of the universe is zero then it’s conceivable that the
universe came from absolute nothing. The evidence that the total energy of the
universe is zero is the observation that the universe appears flat overall.
Bringing in general relativity to justify this, a metric that is flat overall looks
something like the Minkowski metric except that it may be locally curved however
the total energy contributed by every inhomogeneity is zero.
The universe is then a mass fluctuation out of absolute
nothingness but adds up to nothing and so could be considered nothingness which
isn’t in equilibrium. There is a certain implication from this which is
somewhat philosophical but also pragmatic: this absolute nothingness was imbued
with the law of energy conservation. The nothingness then could be said to have
some sort of mathematical adherence; this in itself could be considered to be a
property and so the pre-universal state wasn’t necessarily absolute
nothingness. One could progress and ask how far do we have to go reach a point
where there was absolute nothingness; does such a thing exist? Maybe this
mathematical adherence is fundamental to anything that could be considered a
state of pre-universal nothingness. However there is one thing which is more
grounded and that is to say that since the universe sprung from this “nothingness”
which possesses laws the nothingness could be said to be some sort of
extra-universal plane-just a description nothing inexplicably profound-which
the universe exists within even now.
I would also like to expound a conceptual idea of mine that
takes a different stance to the one which conceives time as always flowing. The
idea is simply that space-time is static and we experience times slices through
it as moments. We can say that constant motion through time is required in
order for us to perceive-without motion through time there would be no
perception. So we are 4 dimensional structures in space-time and each three
dimensional slice of constant time is the “present” and moving through these
slices generates our perceptions. A side note here would be this is not as
depressing as it sounds; these structures (us) are still self-influencing and
influence their own future. So in a sense our perceptions and time are running in tandem by necessity.
No comments:
Post a Comment